Social anxiety disorder is a mental health condition that affects 4.7% of Australians each year. The complex interplay between psychoevolutionary and cognitive models has become the focus of research in recent years, particularly with the development of the bivalent fear of evaluation model (i.e., negative and positive evaluation fears). The present study aimed to test a model of social anxiety symptoms using structural equation modelling, integrating previously fragmented evidence. A sample of 255 participants (75.3% female; Myears = 31.9, SD = 10.3) undertook an online survey, including Social Phobia Scale, Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation-Straightforward, Fear of Positive Evaluation, Concerns of Social Reprisal, and Disqualifications of Positive Social Outcomes measures. The hypothesised model for social anxiety symptoms described the data reasonably well (? 2 (1) = 4.917, p = .027, CFI = .995, GFI = .992, SRMR = .017), explaining 57.1% of social anxiety variance. Study hypotheses were supported with bivalent fear of evaluation accounting for unique variance in cognitive distortions, which in turn accounted for unique variation in social anxiety symptoms. Effect sizes indicate bivalent fears of evaluation and disqualification of positive social outcomes as important predictors of social anxiety symptoms. Although replication in a clinical cohort and experimental confirmation are needed, the findings suggest a focus on disqualification of positive social outcomes to alleviate social anxiety symptoms.
What This topic Adds?
Impression models advise that the fresh new intellectual deformation disqualification out of positive personal outcomes is an important modifiable predictor away from personal nervousness periods.
Introduction
Social panic attacks (SAD) is actually a mental health situation by which anyone worry and you will survive that have aches otherwise end societal things, like personal correspondence or activities that erican Psychiatric Organization, 2013 ). Sad has a projected 12?week incidence regarding cuatro.7% (Australian Bureau regarding Analytics, 2007 ) and a lifestyle incidence away from twelve% (Kessler mais aussi al., 2005 ). People who have Sad be more than two times as going to deal with unemployment weighed against people who have almost every other panic disorders (Moitra, Mustache, Weisberg, Keller, 2011 ). Given the impression from Sad, you will need to see the underlying processes that will influence societal nervousness symptoms.
Personal nervousness usually might have been thought as associated with a beneficial concern with negative comparison (FNE) (Watson Buddy, 1969 ). The connection ranging from Unfortunate and you may FNE might have been extensively supported (Koci ; Menatti ainsi que al., 2015 ; Months, 2015 ; Months Howell, 2012 ; Yap, Gibbs, Francis, Schuster, 2016 ). An impact out-of FNE might have been thought to be a hereditary possibility recognition program from our psychoevolutionary prior one to motivates us to customize behaviors in a manner that handles united states of public damage, like a loss of the means to access classification information because of exemption (Clark Wells, 1995 ; Gilbert, 2001 ). Thought designs about FNE try theorised to help you escalate and you will perpetuate social nervousness symptoms (Rapee Heimberg, 1997 ).
Now, concern with positive review (FPE) might have been thought in the look, suggesting one FNE and FPE co?exist as the an excellent bivalent anxiety about analysis (BFOE), where someone worry comparison in general (Months Howell, 2014 ). The relationship ranging from Sad and you can FPE have achieved increasing assistance when you look at the the past few years (Koci ; Menatti et al., 2015 ; Months, 2015 ; Months Howell, 2012 ; Yap ainsi que al., 2016 ). Whereas FNE is concerned having an awful move within the research, FPE is worried with an optimistic shift for the analysis. An impact regarding FPE could have been regarded as a genetic possibility recognition program you to definitely motivates avoidant conduct to the being examined also favorably, to help you reduce the danger of signalling difficulties and you may unknowingly entering into a lot of disagreement or battle (Trower Gilbert, 1989 ; Weeks Howell, 2014 ). The new thought habits close BFOE have not yet , come fixed (Heimberg, Brozovich, Rapee, 2010 ), consequently they are the main focus in the papers.